10.6084/m9.figshare.3560757.v1 Heather J. Lynch Heather J. Lynch James T. Thorson James T. Thorson Andrew Olaf Shelton Andrew Olaf Shelton Appendix A. Best fit parameters and model comparison for Case Studies 1, 2, and 3 (Tables A1 –A3); empirical histograms and best fit probability mass functions comparing the Poisson, Generalized Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Conway-Maxwell Poisson distribution fits for Case Studies 1 and 2 (Fig. A1); and point patterns from Jeltsch Fig. 7 used in Case Study 2 (Fig. A2). Wiley 2016 Conway-Maxwell-Poisson species diversity complete spatial randomness COM-Poisson generalized Poisson probability distribution point pattern litter size Environmental Science Ecology 2016-08-10 07:47:27 Dataset https://wiley.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Appendix_A_Best_fit_parameters_and_model_comparison_for_Case_Studies_1_2_and_3_Tables_A1_A3_empirical_histograms_and_best_fit_probability_mass_functions_comparing_the_Poisson_Generalized_Poisson_Negative_Binomial_and_Conway-Maxwell_Poisson_distribution_fi/3560757 Best fit parameters and model comparison for Case Studies 1, 2, and 3 (Tables A1 –A3); empirical histograms and best fit probability mass functions comparing the Poisson, Generalized Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Conway-Maxwell Poisson distribution fits for Case Studies 1 and 2 (Fig. A1); and point patterns from Jeltsch Fig. 7 used in Case Study 2 (Fig. A2).