10.6084/m9.figshare.3560757.v1
Heather J. Lynch
Heather
J. Lynch
James T. Thorson
James
T. Thorson
Andrew Olaf Shelton
Andrew Olaf
Shelton
Appendix A. Best fit parameters and model comparison for Case Studies 1, 2, and 3 (Tables A1 –A3); empirical histograms and best fit probability mass functions comparing the Poisson, Generalized Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Conway-Maxwell Poisson distribution fits for Case Studies 1 and 2 (Fig. A1); and point patterns from Jeltsch Fig. 7 used in Case Study 2 (Fig. A2).
Wiley
2016
Conway-Maxwell-Poisson
species diversity
complete spatial randomness
COM-Poisson
generalized Poisson
probability distribution
point pattern
litter size
Environmental Science
Ecology
2016-08-10 07:47:27
Dataset
https://wiley.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Appendix_A_Best_fit_parameters_and_model_comparison_for_Case_Studies_1_2_and_3_Tables_A1_A3_empirical_histograms_and_best_fit_probability_mass_functions_comparing_the_Poisson_Generalized_Poisson_Negative_Binomial_and_Conway-Maxwell_Poisson_distribution_fi/3560757
Best fit parameters and model comparison for Case Studies 1, 2, and 3 (Tables A1 –A3); empirical histograms and best fit probability mass functions comparing the Poisson, Generalized Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Conway-Maxwell Poisson distribution fits for Case Studies 1 and 2 (Fig. A1); and point patterns from Jeltsch Fig. 7 used in Case Study 2 (Fig. A2).