Joshua J. Lawler, Denis White, and Lawrence L. Master. 2004. Integrating representation and vulnerability: two approaches for prioritizing areas for conservation: Erratum. Ecological Applications 14:635.

Erratum

Corrected version of Fig. 5 (which originally appeared in Lawler et al., 2003, Ecological Applications 13:1762–1772): maps depicting two approaches to prioritizing areas for conservation based on species representation and site vulnerability.
Ecological Archives A014-008.

Copyright


 
   FIG. 5 (corrected). Maps depicting two approaches to prioritizing areas for conservation based on species representation and site vulnerability. Map A represents both irreplaceability (a measure of conservation value for 497 vertebrate species) and vulnerability (a measure of the degree to which sites are influenced by agriculture, urban and suburban development, and open mines). Irreplaceability values increase with the intensity of cyan (). The vulnerability of sites to each of the three types of threats increases with the intensity of magenta (). The dark blue sites are those that are both important for conserving species diversity and vulnerable to species loss, whereas the white sites are those that have both low irreplaceability values and low vulnerability values. Map B represents a set of 27 sites that includes all 497 species and maximizes the vulnerability across sites.


ESA Publications | Ecological Archives | Permissions | Citation | Contacts